Last reviewed January 2010
Resources on Minnesota Issues
Minnesota Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands
This guide is compiled by staff at the Minnesota Legislative Reference
Library on a topic of interest to Minnesota legislators. It is designed
to provide an introduction to the topic, directing the user to a variety
of sources, and is not intended to be exhaustive.
Minnesota's Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) lands located in the
counties of Aitkin, Beltrami, Koochiching, Lake of the Woods, Mahnomen,
Marshall, and Roseau became state owned through tax forfeiture in 1929,
1931 and 1933. In an effort to make these lands more suitable for agricultural
purposes the counties had issued bonds for drainage ditches. The unsuitability
of the land for farming purposes and the Great Depression contributed
to massive abandonment of the lands and their resultant tax delinquency.
This in turn caused defaults on the payments of the bonds and several
counties were in danger of bankruptcy. To prevent this from happening
the state agreed to take on the drainage debts totaling approximately
$4,750,000. In return the state was given clear title to about 1.6 million
acres of land which became known as Con-Con lands. These lands are governed
by Minnesota
Statutes, chapter 84A.
The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources was charged with managing
these lands. The bulk of them were placed under one of five different
designations: wildlife management areas, state forests, state parks,
scientific and natural areas, or agricultural lands. About half of the
acres were designated as agricultural lands and sold, only to become
tax delinquent once more. The remaining public lands have generated
income for the counties in the form of payments in lieu of taxes (Minnesota
Statutes, sections 477A.11 - 477A.145). In addition, the
counties also received 50% of any revenue generated from the sale of
resources on these state owned lands. By 1990, approximately 3/4 of the
acres of land had been placed under one of the five designations.
In January 1991, Commissioner Joe Alexander ordered that over 100,000
additional acres of land in Beltrami, Marshall, and Roseau counties would be designated as wildlife
management areas. On January 3, 1999, outgoing Commissioner Rod Sando
issued an order that designated all the remaining Con-Con lands as wildlife management
areas. On January 27, 1999, the order was suspended by Acting Commissioner
Ray Hitchcock in order to solicit opinions from interested parties
on the appropriate designations for the lands. In addition the Minnesota Attorney
General's Office advised that any permanent designations of the remaining
acres as state forests or wildlife management areas would require legislative
approval. In 2000, about 260,000 acres of land were so designated by the Minnesota
Legislature.
This same legislation allowed counties affected
by Commissioner Alexander's 1991 Con-Con land designations to request
a review of those designations. All the affected counties requested
a review. After public review, Commissioner Allen Garber
recommended that the Minnesota Legislature designate the remaining lands
as wildlife management areas. The issue was addressed by the Minnesota Legislature
in 2001 and the legislation passed in 2002. Effective January 1, 2003 the final
Con-Con acres were officially designated as wildlife management areas. The 2002
legislation also required the designation of at least 90 miles of all-terrain vehicle (ATV)
trails in these wildlife management areas. In January 2006, Commissioner Gene Merriam issued an order
related to the designation of these ATV trails. The order becomes effective on December 31, 2006.
LEGISLATIVE HISTORY:
Laws of Minnesota
1929, chapter
258 established the reforestation and flood control areas in Beltrami,
Koochiching, and Lake of the Woods counties.
Laws of Minnesota
1931, chapter 407 established those in Aitkin, Mahnomen, and Roseau counties.
Laws of Minnesota
1933, chapter 402 was responsible for Marshall
county's reforestation project. In the
Laws of
Minnesota 1949, chapter 498, section 2 the legislature combined the
money from these lands into the Consolidated Conservation Areas Fund,
currently codified as
Minnesota Statutes, section 84A.51. The Minnesota legislature
curtailed the addition of future tax forfeited lands when it passed
Laws of
Minnesota 1984, chapter 654, article 2, section 84, currently
codified as
Minnesota Statutes, section 84A.57. In an effort to designate more of these lands, in 2000 the
legislature introduced and heard
House File 3167/
Senate File 3131. The Con-Con language was discussed on the Senate
Floor on 5/9/2000 as an amendment to
House File 3213 which became
Laws of Minnesota 2000, chapter
485. In 2001
Senate File 2125
/
House File 1359
were introduced to address the designation of the final acres originally designated
in 1991. The legislation passed in 2002 and became
Laws of Minnesota 2002, chapter 353. Additional amendments
are referenced in the history section at the end of the relevant
Minnesota Statutes.
SIGNIFICANT BOOKS AND REPORTS:
Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands Disposition Recommendation to the Minnesota
Senate and House Environment & Natural Resource Committees. St. Paul: Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, January 15, 2001. (HD 243 .M6 D72 2001) (Required by
Laws
of Minnesota 2000, chapter 485, section 25g.)
Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands Legislative Report. St. Paul: Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, January 15, 2003. (HD 243 .M6 D725 2003) (Required by
Laws
of Minnesota 2002, chapter 353, section 8.)
Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands Legislative Report. St. Paul: Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources, January 15, 2004. (HD 243 .M6 D725 2004) (Required by
Laws
of Minnesota 2002, chapter 353, section 8.)
Dana, Samuel Trask, John H. Allison and Russell N. Cunningham. Minnesota
Lands: Ownership, Use, and Management of Forest and Related Lands.
Washington D.C.: The American Forestry Association, 1960, p. 156-168.
(HD 211 .M6 D3)
Draft Recommendations Related to the Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands Under
Review. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, September 29, 2000.
(HD 243 .M6 D72 2000) (Required by
Laws of Minnesota
2000, chapter 485, section 25e.)
FY ... in Lieu of Tax, MS 477A.11-14.
St. Paul:
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Bureau of Real Estate Management, 1996-99.
(HJ 4231 .F98)
Helmberger, John. Transfer of
Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Land Administration from the Department of Natural Resources to
the Counties, Analysis of Fiscal Impacts; Final Report. Saint Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, 2000. (HD243.M6 H45 2000)
Isolated Consolidated-Conservation (Con-Con) Lands Report to the Minnesota Senate and
House Environment & Natural Resource Committees. St. Paul: Minnesota Department
of Natural Resources, January 15, 2001. (HD 243 .M6 D724 2001) (Required by
Laws of Minnesota
2000, chapter 485, section 26.)
Merrian, Gene. Designation
of All-Terrain Vehicle Trails in Wildlife Management Areas on Lands under the Authority of the Commissioner in
Aitkin, Beltrami and Marshall Counties, Minnesota. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources,
January 3, 2006. (Vertical File: P191)
Stinchfield, Joseph, and Brian Stenquist.
Long Range Plan for Land
Acquisition and Disposition in Counties with Consolidated Conservation
Land. St. Paul: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, September,
1984. (HD 211 .M6 S74) [Required by
Laws
of Minnesota 1983, chapter 301, section 31, subdivision 3(o)]
SIGNIFICANT ARTICLES:
Beeman, Michelle. "The Epic Journey of Con-Con Lands." Roots,
March 2001, p. 1, 4.
Christenson, Sam. "Designating the Consolidated Conservation
Lands." Roots, June 1999, p. 1, 4.
Currie, Leigh. "The Fate of 102,000 Acres of Con Con Lands is Up in the Air - in
More Ways Than One." Minnesota Out-of-Doors,
January/February 2002, p. 12-13, 17, 20.
Dokken, Brad "Finding Common Ground for ATVs Proves Elusive."
Grand Forks Herald, December 9, 2001, p. 1B.
Drieslein, Rob. "Garber: DNR Proposes Keeping Con-Con Lands."
Outdoor News, August 20, 1999, p. 1, 21.
Hitchcock, Raymond B. "Hitchcock Replies." Star Tribune,
February 21, 1999, p. 24A (Letters from Readers).
Kallok, Mike. "DNR to Discuss Ditch Maintenance in Con-Con Areas."
Outdoor News, May 25, 2007, p. 7.
Karnowski, Steve. "DNR Plan Aims to Resolve Con-Con Dispute of
187,000 Acres, Most Would Become Designated Forest." St. Paul
Pioneer Press, August 17, 1999, p. 3B.
Ness, Lance. "Con-Cons: Do it for Joe." Outdoor News,
February 8, 2002, p. 2, 18.
Niskanen, Chris. "Before Opposing Public Land, Remember Its Benefits."
St. Paul Pioneer Press, June 2, 1999, p. 2C.
Niskanen, Chris. "State's Con-Con Lands up for Grabs." St.
Paul Pioneer Press, February 7, 1999, p. 15C.
Perich, Shawn. "Controversy Puts Public Lands at Risk."
Outdoor News, February 5, 1999, p. 1, 4.
"Proposed Con-Con Land Designations Announced by DNR." Minnesota
Out-of-Doors, September/October 1999, p. 21-22.
Schara, Ron. "Sando's Last Good Deed Undone by Interim DNR Chief."
Star Tribune, February 14, 1999, p. 18C.
Smith, Doug. "175,000 Acres are Crux of DNR Debate."
Star Tribune, February 10, 1999, p. 10C.
Smith, Doug. "90 Miles of Trails Near Wildlife Areas to be Opened to ATVs." Star Tribune,
January 4, 2006, p. 6B.
Smith, Doug. "WMA Controversy Unsettled." Star Tribune, May 13, 2001, p. C13.
Spielman, Tim. "DNR: Keep Remaining Con-Cons as WMAs." Outdoor
News, October 13, 2000, p. 1, 20.
Spielman, Tim. "Lottery-in-Lieu Funds Con-Con Compromise." Outdoor
News, March 15, 2002, p. 1, 27.
Spielman, Tim. "Remaining Con-Cons Up for Review." Outdoor
News, July 28, 2000, p. 3.
SIGNIFICANT INTERNET RESOURCES:
Consolidated Conservation (Con-Con) Lands -- From the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources.
ADDITIONAL LIBRARY RESOURCES:
For historical information, check the following codes in the Newspaper Clipping File and the
Vertical File:
M68-Natural Resources Department (DNR), P191 (Public Lands MN)
For additional reports at the Legislative Reference Library, use this
Library catalog search:
Consolidated Conservation Lands