Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature
Skip Navigation Links > >

Virtual File - Item

Title: Gov. Dayton letter to Speaker Daudt re reinsurance bill (HF5)
Article Date: 4/3/2017
Source:
Author:
Type: Other
URL:
File: 2017_04_03_Gov Dayton Letter_Reinsurance Bill.pdf 

Text: The Honorable Kurt Daudt
Speaker of the House
Room 463, State Office Building
100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155

Dear Mr. Speaker:

Last Thursday, March 30, 2017, I received the Conference Report passed that day by
both the Minnesota House and Senate, which appropriates $542 million of state funds in the
FY18-19 Biennium to subsidize insurance companies operating in the so-called Individual
Market. I recognize that this bill has been a top priority of your respective Leaders, since the
Session's beginning; and I commend you and them for moving it expeditiously through the
legislative process.

I thank you for involving members of my administration, including senior agency
officials, governor's office staff, and myself, in your deliberations. I trust you feel that we
were fully engaged with you, whenever requested, throughout that process. In particular, I
am glad that my staff was able to help clarify with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid
Services the language necessary to qualify this new program for a federal cost-share of up to
30 percent, which would save us about $162 million while protecting federal funding for
MinnesotaCare.

Unfortunately, two of my main concerns about the bill were not addressed in the final
Conference Report. The first was the source of funding for the insurance subsidies. In my
March 29th letter to the two of you, I reiterated what I had been saying during previous
weeks: "The conference report uses the Health Care Access Fund and the General Fund to
cover the state responsibility for reinsurance. I believe reinsurance should be funded by a tax
on the industry itself, as was the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Association. The General
Fund and Health Care Access Fund dollars should be used for statewide priorities like
schools, early childhood education and health care for low-income Minnesotans.
Furthermore, it is unwise to use Health Care Access Fund dollars without repealing the sunset
of the two percent provider tax that sustains the fund."

My proposal was ignored, because of, I am told, opposition by the insurance industry.
Thus, the bill not only provides insurers with up to $542 million of taxpayers' dollars, as
direct subsidies to their businesses, but also allows them both to dictate where that money
shall come from and to evade any financial responsibility for their own aid program.

Secondly, my proposal to include a MinnesotaCare Buy-In option for Minnesotans
purchasing health insurance on the Individual Market was rejected. As a result, private
insurance companies will decide our citizens' options, including the extent of coverage, the
composition of the provider networks, and the cost of their insurance.

The MinnesotaCare Buy-In would have added some much-needed competition into
the Individual Market. It could have offered many Minnesotans more comprehensive health
care coverage, through more accessible provider networks, at lower insurance costs, than will
be available to them under this bill's limitations. Why would the insurance companies'
preferences and profits be placed ahead of the people's best interests?

Finally, I am deeply concerned that this $542 million subsidy is being offered to
insurance companies, who refuse to make any commitments about their participations in next
year's Individual Market or the insurance rates they will charge Minnesotans. On March 16,
2017, I wrote the attached letter to the Chief Executive Officers of each of the presently
participating insurers. I said, in part, " If the Legislature chooses to advance these
reinsurance bills, it is imperative that your industry publicly commit to Minnesotans that,
moving forward, you will specifically: 1) sell products statewide in the individual market
and; 2) lower premiums to a level that will make insurance coverage more affordable than it
is today. I ask that you provide consumers, the Legislature, and me with these public
commitments as soon as possible Minnesotans deserve to know that a program of this scale
and cost will actually have the intended results of stabilizing the individual insurance market
and improving its affordability for consumers. Thank you in advance for your swift reply."

To date, I have not received even the decency of a written reply from a single one of
those CEOs, much less their answers to my questions. I know that they have refused to
provide those same assurances, when asked by individual legislators and by legislative
committees. Yet, this bill would contribute $542 million of public monies to their bottom
lines without even the acknowledgement of my request for information or the information I
requested.

On March 22, I stated publicly that I would not sign a Reinsurance bill until I
received written replies to my questions from the insurance executives. Having received no
responses, I could not sign this legislation for that reason alone, in addition to my other
concerns previously stated.

However, I agree with you, this bill's authors, and those legislative leaders, who
believe that this subsidy must be committed to the health insurance industry at this time, to
try to induce their participation in Minnesota's Individual Market in 2018 at the lowest
possible rates. Thus I will allow this measure to become law by not acting upon it within the
requisite three days, which end at midnight tonight. I will deposit, without signature, in the
office of the Secretary of state, Chapter 13, House File 5.

I challenge Minnesota's health insurance companies to provide our citizens with good
value for their $542 million. I challenge the health plans to honor their promises to the
Department of Human Services, to negotiate and work in good faith, and honor their
commitment to service on behalf of the 1 million Minnesotans on Medicaid who rely on
them. I challenge all of the companies to become partners with my administration in a
common cause to once again provide Minnesotans with the best health coverage at the most
affordable costs.

Sincerely,
Mark Dayton
Governor

Attachment
cc:
Senator Michelle L. Fischbach, President of the Senate
Senator Paul Gazelka, Senate Majority Leader
Senator Thomas M. Bakk, Senate Minority Leader
Senator Gary H. Dahms, Senate
Representative Melissa Hortman, House Minority Leader
Representative Greg Davids, House
The Honorable Steve Simon, Secretary of State
Mr. Cal Ludeman, Secretary of the Senate
Mr. Patrick Murphy, Chief Clerk of the House of Representatives
Mr. Paul Marinac, Revisor of Statutes


Search



Date: to
Topics: (Show Topics)
LRL Historical Resource