Skip to main content Skip to office menu Skip to footer
Capital IconMinnesota Legislature
Skip Navigation Links > >

Virtual File - Item

Title: Rep. Peggy Scott Letter Special Session Response
Article Date: 8/7/2023
Source:
Author:
Type: Other
URL:
File: Rep. Scott Letter - Special Session Response.pdf 

Text: August 7, 2023

The Honorable Tim Walz
Governor of Minnesota
130 State Capitol
75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55155

The Honorable Melissa Hortman
Speaker of the House of Representatives
Minnesota House of Representatives
463 State Office Building
St. Paul, MN 55155

The Honorable Kari Dziedzic
Senate Majority Leader
Minnesota Senate
3113 Minnesota Senate Building
St. Paul, MN 55155

via electronic delivery

Dear Governor Walz, Speaker Hortman, and Majority Leader Dziedzic:

We are disappointed in your unwillingness to address glaring defects in the 2023 Marijuana
Legalization law. In the days since our initial letter, it has become clearer that Minnesota
Democrats still do not understand the full implications of the new law - particularly when it
comes to keeping kids away from drugs.

In addition to Democrats' stated intent of decriminalizing marijuana consumption for minors, the
legalization bill contains additional dangerous gaps, contradictions, and loopholes as it relates to
consumption of marijuana products:

HF 100 Incentivizes Minors to Consume Marijuana. The bill's author, Sen. Lindsey Port,
stated in an interview with MinnPost that decriminalization for young people was "intentional"
and that "prohibition doesn't work." Once outraged parents and community leaders started
asking questions, the tune changed and supporters began claiming that a non-criminal statutory
penalty applies to youth marijuana consumption.

Without reinstatement of clear consequences, law enforcement is left to wonder whether the
default penalty statute is a viable avenue for punishing minor consumption - and whether the
equivalent of a parking ticket is really a deterrent.

Moreover, decriminalizing marijuana for kids results in a peculiar disparity in the state's
penalties for underage consumption of marijuana and alcohol, the latter of which is punishable as
a misdemeanor or even a gross misdemeanor in some circumstances. The preferential treatment
of marijuana products in HF 100 may create a legal incentive for minors to use the drug.

HF 100 Reduces Penalties for Illegal Sale to Minors. The House author of HF 100, Rep. Zack
Stephenson, claims the bill includes severe penalties for selling marijuana products to underage
persons. However, the bill's penalties for illegal sale to minors are significantly lighter compared
to the former penalties under the controlled substance act.

The previous punishment for the illegal sale of marijuana to a person under 18 years of age was
up to 20 years imprisonment and a penalty of up to $250,000.
The new penalties for illegal sale, including to a minor, range from up to one to five years of
imprisonment and a penalty of up to $3,000 to $10,000 depending on the age disparity between
the seller and buyer. It's clear that, contrary to Rep. Stephenson's statements, HF 100
significantly reduced the penalties for selling drugs to minors. Minn. Stat. 152.023, Minn. Stat.
152.0264.

HF 100 Enables Criminals Who Exploit Minors. HF 100 imposes only a petty misdemeanor
or misdemeanor for the illegal sale of marijuana products if the seller is a minor. Anyone can see
this slap-on-the-wrist penalty will encourage organized criminals to exploit teenagers and young
adults as sellers in the illegal market.

HF 100 Lets Negligent Adults Off the Hook. For decades, Minnesota's alcohol regulations
have imposed civil liability on adults who allow underage kids to get drunk on their property and
the underage kid causes harm to another person. Minn. Stat. 340A.90. Social host liability laws
are an important deterrent against reckless situations where adults allow underage kids to get
drunk and drive.

HF 100 fails to extend the same liability to parents and other adult hosts who allow kids to get
high on marijuana products and drive or engage in other behavior that results in harm or death.

HF 100 Makes It Easier to Get Away with Driving While High. According to new reporting
by Peter Callaghan of MinnPost, HF 100 exacerbated a loophole for marijuana-impaired drivers.
Attorneys are already advising drivers to, absent a warrant, refuse field sobriety and blood tests
that are vital to convicting high drivers given the lack of a breath test equivalent for marijuana.

Prior to passage, it was widely noted that HF 100's timeline for marijuana legalization was far
ahead of law enforcement technology. Nevertheless, the bill was pushed along into law. Now the
consequences will come home to roost - putting Minnesota's youth at even greater risk.

We believe in rehabilitation, treatment, and second chances, but HF 100 provides no serious
penalties of last resort for illegal possession, consumption, or sale by a minor. And it enables
adults to exploit minors or act in a negligent manner toward minor intoxication. Reinstating
serious penalties will show that our state takes underage consumption seriously and does not
tolerate the exploitation of young people for illegal drug trafficking.

HF 100 is poorly crafted, inconsistent, and in need of immediate remedy to avoid preventable
damage. Please don't let partisan allegiances get in the way of resolving issues that are important
to parents, law enforcement, and community leaders across our state.

Sincerely,

Peggy Scott
State Representative, District 31B

Lisa Demuth
House Minority Leader

Paul Torkelson
State Representative, District 37A

John Burkel
State Representative, District 1A

Bernie Perryman
State Representative, District 14A

Dean Urdahl
State Representative, District 16A

Thomas Murphy
State Representative, District 9B

Jeff Dotseth
State Representative, District 11A

Greg Davids
State Representative, District 28B

Brian Daniels
State Representative, District 19A

Joe Schomacker
State Representative, District 21A

Pam Altendorf
State Representative, District 20A

Ron Kresha
State Representative, District 10A

Mary Franson
State Representative, District 12B

Paul Novotny
State Representative, District 30B

Marj Fogelman
State Representative, District 21B

Kristin Robbins
State Representative, District 37A

Jon Koznick State
Representative, District 57A

Krista Knudsen
State Representative, District 05A

Nathan Nelson
State Representative, District 11

Joe McDonald
State Representative, District 29A

Brian Johnson
State Representative, District 28A

Isaac Schultz
State Representative, District 10B

John Petersburg
State Representative, District 19B

Walter Hudson
State Representative, District 30A

Mike Wiener
State Representative, District 5B

Debra Kiel
State Representative, District 1B

Bobbie Harder
State Representative, District 17B

Andrew Myers
State Representative, District 45A

Mark Wiens
State Representative, District 41A




Search



Date: to
Topics: (Show Topics)
LRL Historical Resource